Is
Magic a Serious Research Topic? Reflexions on Some French Students’ Remarks about
Magic in Psychology by Pascal Morchain in Psychology and Psychotherapy:
Research Study: Crimson Publishers_Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy
This paper investigates the reasons for which some
students in psychology curriculum seem to be not interested in the theme of
magic as a research topic. Contextual factors are evoked, but this apparent
disinterest is also interpreted in terms of representations of psychology,
representations of magic, historical factors, and in terms of social value of
the topic. Is magic a serious research topic? This question
seems a bit weird. Obviously, in psychology show magic is a very serious topic.
It deals with psychological processes, and with social interactions. In the
late 19th century and early 20th century, famous psychologists as Binet [1,2];
Jastrow [3]; Triplett [4] use magical performances to understand psychological
functioning. In 1999 Lamont & Wiseman [5] published Magic in theory, a
theoretical book analysing the art of magic. Between 1887 and 1999, only 12
empirical articles about perception of magic in adults were published; they
were 55 between 2000 and 2016 [6]. Nowadays, this field is sometimes called
“science of magic” [7,8] or, most specifically, “neuromagic” [9]. In
psychology, magic can be studied as any other object, or can be a mean to study
psychological processes [10].
Follow On Publons : https://publons.com/publisher/6342/crimson-publishers
Follow On Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/company/crimsonpublishers
For more open access journals in crimson publishers please
click on link: https://crimsonpublishersresearch.com/
For more articles on Journal of Psychology and
Psychotherapy please
click on: https://crimsonpublishers.com/pprs/
No comments:
Post a Comment