Crimson Publishers is an Open-access academic publisher has a vision to establish Open Science platform that seeks to provide equal opportunity for all, share and create knowledge, and enables the scholarly world to engage in a dialogue with the science in a more effective manner. Our efficient and transparent ways of peer-review procedures provide impact metrics for articles and researchers.
Crimson Publishers High Impact Journals
▼
▼
Monday, September 24, 2018
Novel Approaches in Cancer Study( NACS ISSN: 2637-773X, Impact Factor:0.637)
The role of immune system in treating cancer is being increasingly
seen as important [1]. Cancer cells have oncogenic mutations and
express neo-antigens that make them distinct from normal cells
thus prone to immune recognition. However, cells of innate and
adaptive immune system which recognize and destroy these cells
are held in check by various molecular pathways called “immune
checkpoints” [2]. Attempts have been made to block these immune
checkpoints to develop anticancer immunotherapies. Blockage
of Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA4) and Programmed
Death 1 (PD1), the first 2 checkpoint receptors to be discovered,
has been studied widely in various cancers. Bristol Myers Squibb
(BMS)’s ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody against CTLA4, was
efficacious and produced a durable response against melanoma. It
was approved as the standard treatment for melanoma [3-5]. BMS’s
nivolumab, Merck’s pembrolizumab, and Roche’s atezolizumab are
monoclonal antibodies against PD1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab)
or PD Ligand 1(PD-L1) (atezolizumab). They are efficacious in
various malignancies including melanoma, kidney cancer, nonsmall
cell lung cancer, urothelial cancer, and colon cancer [6-17].
PD-L1 expression has been suggested as a predictive biomarker
for these antibodies but due to lack of a single standardized
assay for measuring the expression of these surface proteins and
lack of consistency in trial design across different antibodies,
data supporting the predictive value of PD-L1 expression are not
uniform [18].
No comments:
Post a Comment